IIM faculty slams HRD panel report on reforms

Create: 04/26/2011 - 14:17

The findings of the RC Bhargava Committee’s report on the ‘Governance Structure for IIMs’ has been attracting criticism from the faculties of the IIMs. Recently, two IIM – Bangalore professors have launched a scathing attack on Bhargava Committee’s report terming it as a move to centralise power, and destroy the decentralised governance structure of the elite B-schools.

An article titled “Governance of IIMs- A critique of the Bhargava Committee Report”, authored by Amit Gupta and Ganesh N Prabhu says the RC Bhargava Committee report on new governance structure of the IIMs, co-authored by three current directors, “is a blatantly self-serving report by directors who seek to centralise power and destroy the decentralised governance structure that has made the IIMs institutions of excellence”.

The article accuses that the committee while preparing its proposal had failed to recognise the faculty as stakeholders and sought to minimise their role in governance. The committee set up by HRD Minister Kapil Sibal in April 2010 on a new ‘Governance Structure for IIMs’ has advocated reducing the size of IIM Boards and Society, reconstituting the society to allow alumni, corporates and suitable individuals to become members on payment of a donation ranging from Rs 5 crore to Rs 20 crore, 160 teaching hours per year for faculty, besides annual reviews, redesignating IIM Directors as CEO and President among other proposals.

The article has noted that  “the statements in the report relating to faculty are largely negative and show contempt for the faculty."

The article has also objected to proposals to hike the IIM Director’s salary and re-designate them as CEO, the IIM faculty members have argued that while the committee intends to reduce the legitimate role of faculty, it aims to increase the illegitimate role of directors and the board to control the faculty.

It is also argued that the new empowered Board and Director as proposed by the committee will only centralise power.

Terming the proposal of allowing donation-based membership to the IIM boards as “most absurd”, the critique argues that this will only facilitate a backdoor entry to privatisation where money minded people will take over the prestigious IIMs and might seek a return on their investment by serving their own interests.

Earlier this month, Indian Institute of Management (IIM)-Calcutta had openly expressed their displeasure over the governance and restructuring reforms in suggested by the HRD panel.

[Source: Indian Express]

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

I fully endorse the Bhargava Committee's and Balakrishnan Committee's recommendations on new structures for IIMs. IIMs have no governance now, no faculty appraisal, and most IIMs have become dens of corruption and vices.In the garb of autonomy and academic freedom, there is no accountability at all levels and hence total anarchy prevails. Faculty in areas like Environment, Economics, Sociology etc. have no academic targets and hence are not able to contribute to academics and research. They only acclerate politicization of the system. What goes in the name of Faculty Decisions is usually a desperate attempt by the corrupt coterie to hold on to power by hook or by crook, hardly five faculty members out of ninety go for faculty meeting and all are forced to sign the nauseating document called minutes. The corrupt coterie is usually led by Director, with two mentors, the predecessor Director and the ordained criminal in the faculty who does not stop short of even murder. Naturally, soon the Director becomes a puppet or kathputli in the hands of this mafia, the BOG becomes a prisoner. Departments like student admission, PGP, Placement, faculty recruitment, engineering division, administration, become active only when lubricated, even if by gross violation of law, rules and regulations, even Memorandum of Association. Money in lieu of Merit is the most popular scheme in IIMs, thanks to the paper shredding machines in MHRD, PMO, and elsewhere.
In this background, no wonder no Director is available even at Rs. one crore. Because much more than one crore is being made now, Rs. 20 lakhs in salary which is taxable, and Rs. 0ne crore at least as invisible incentive which is non-taxable. Any Professor who protests, and those who are renowned as professionals, are compelled by the coterie to leave the system, even if at gun-point. Thus IIMs have become a national shame, courtesy the MHRD, PMO and GOI. Government must implement the recommendations of Bhargava and Balakrishnan Committees in toto, immediately, as otherwise it may be concluded that the Government, in collusion with the Red Flag Parties is hand in gloves with IIM Corruption Mafia.

About Author

India Education Review
India Education Review is a platform that aims to provide information and resources to senior educators nationwide. Carrying news, interviews, guest articles, case studies, information on training and developmental programs, scholarships and jobs, India Education Review is the platform of choice for the educator community in India today