Public Private Partnership, the best foot forward for Higher Education

Create: 02/17/2012 - 11:06

Imparting education is generally
perceived as the responsibility of the government. But, lack of
financial and managerial capacity often impede the government’s ability with regard to national education system. Another problem is the
rotation of power both in the centre and in the states. Till now the central government has been
spending one per cent of the GDP in education and is planning to increase it to
1.5 per cent.  

Recently, the University
Grants Commission (UGC) has recommended four models of Public Private
Partnership to the Planning Commission and according to an estimate, the country
requires an investment of over US $ 150 billion in the next 10 years. The four models proposed by the Planning Commission are in terms of basic infrastructure
model in which the private sector invests in infrastructure and the government
runs and operates the institutions and in turn pays to the private investor. In
the second model the private sector will not only invest in the infrastructure
but also run and manage the institutions and the government will pay for the
selective services it will avail from the institution. 

In the third model the
investment will be done by both the government and the private sector but the
institutions will be run and managed by the private players and in the fourth model, the government will invest in the infrastructure and
private sector will run and manage the institution. 

There is no doubt that
the government cannot alone handle the investment required in the higher
education sector looking at the growing demand for it and the number of
students entering, thus, posing question both on quality and quantity. India
Education Review asked several of the experts about their view in Public
Private Partnership in Higher Education in the Indian Higher Education System. 

Prof. Pradip Narayan
Ghosh, VC, Jadavpur University shares his views as; “India has made a
remarkable progress in the higher education sector over the last four-five
years. The Gross Enrolment Ratio in the eleventh plan period increased from 10
to 17. This was made possible because of government’s effort by increasing budget
and opening up a large number of new universities, colleges and also IIT’s,
IISER’s and other teaching institutes. But, the government institutes had
always kept the number of students very limited and the infrastructure
development was also rather slow.” 

Talking about the best
way in which PPP can be implemented in India, Prof. Ghosh says, “The noticeable
increase in the last plan period is partly due to the private investment but
only those people having sufficient income or family resources could get
their children admitted to these institutions. Therefore, unless Public Private
Partnership is geared to include these marginalized groups the overall
educational scenario of the country cannot be improved. Further improvement on
GER needs an inclusive policy to accommodate a bigger section of the deprived
people. In such a case Public Private Partnership may play an effective role if
the policy includes the categorization of Higher Income Group (HIG), Middle
Income Group (MIG) and Low Income Group (LIG).” 

The University Grants
Commission (UGC) has been funding the private sector institutions affiliated to
the Universities in all other disciplines except professional areas of study.
For the institutions and universities offering professional courses, there is
no regular funding provided except for token grants for special schemes and
projects as given by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). There
has been continuous demand raised by the private sector institutions for
raising the tuition fees and also in some cases, it is alleged malpractice of
collecting capitation fees. Since there is no special provision in the schemes
for providing loans to the private education providers at low interest rates,
the total funding for establishment and running of Institutions has to be fully
supported by them.  

Prof S.K. Khanna, former
Chairman AICTE and Vice Chairman UGC, suggesting various PPP models says, “The
evolution of Public and Private Participation (PPP) mode is of a significant
importance the most popular mode could be providing the State owned or acquired
land parcels for establishment of new Institutions in emerging areas.  Another
initiative could be facilitating the soft loans to the societies or trusts for
undertaking the project on cost sharing basis with appropriate provisions to
regulate its functioning. Necessarily Institutions under PPP mode should be
established either as autonomous college or with deemed to be university
status.” 

Prof Khanna further
elaborated by saying, “One universal formula can be developed with variable
function of contributions by each of PPP participant. It is not necessary to
have uniform prescription of tuition fees, as it has to be a function of total
capital cost and running cost of the respective institutions as audited and
certified preferably by the government appointed auditors. This would mean that
Institutions under PPP mode providing excellent infrastructure and very high caliber
faculty, and other support staff must be compensated for the cost truthfully.
Such approach would possibly work for creating extraordinary institutions under
PPP mode.” 

M. S. Rawat
Principal DCAC College of Delhi University in his journal ‘Dynamics of
Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education-Indian Perspective
’ writes, “In
India, both public and private educational institutions operate simultaneously.
There is little suspicion and negative connotations regarding private
institutions within public education. By and large in India higher education
system has been “over-regulated” and “under governed” making it more complex
giving rise to ambiguities. The rational of PPP in the Indian context lies in
access, funding and infrastructure. It is important to analyse dynamics between
the two and lay policy dimensions in the best interest of the nation without
diluting education standards. PPP models in support of higher education extend
enough opportunities. PPP formats and the models may vary from project to
project. It is an opportune time for government and the public sector to tap
into private funds through various partnerships.” 

Naresh Wadhwa, President
and Country Manager, Cisco India & South Asia says, “The main rationale for
developing public private partnerships (PPP's) in education is to maximize the
potential to expand equitable access and improve education outcomes, especially
for marginalized groups. PPP, when implemented correctly, can increase
efficiency and choice as well as expand access to education services. It also
allows governments to take advantage of the specialized skills offered by
certain private organizations and to overcome operating limitations faced by
organisations in the public sector. On the other hand, sustainability for the
private sector depends on the innovation and expertise of their employees. The
challenges that higher education institutes face in recruiting and skilling and
enabling students, has a direct bearing on the future workforce and the future
of business and industry at large and I believe the PPP model in education will
be the most effective way to take India forward in the 21st century.” 

Prof. N. Prabhakara Rao,
former VC, Sri Venkateshwara University is also of the of the opinion that PPP
is important for the higher education sector in India and says, “The Public
Private partnership is very important, looking at the growing demand for higher
education in our country. The government is not able to provide quality
education to a large section of students passing out of schools. Thus Public
Private Partnership should be encouraged as India is a vast country. We have to
convince private players to invest in higher education but should also see that
it is not being done to just make money and should have good control and
monitoring for establishment of a quality higher education institution so that
the fee remains equal to that in government run institution.” 

In the 11th five year plan, the government allocated
around Rs 850 billion for higher education but according to Planning Commission, there is resource gap of about Rs 2.2 trillion. Thus without involving private
players it would be difficult for the government alone to fill the gap and
provide quality education. But, at the same time it is also to be seen that
only those private players should allowed bringing up education institutions
who will give priority to providing quality education rather than coming up with
single point agenda of making money and opening shops.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

PPP model is a must for present Indian scenario. The negligence, in the past, towards quality education has led to this situation. And, even though we are capable, now we have to look towards foreign institutes to function here. In the present situation the regulatory bodies should focus on the quality of education. It is not possible in the government set up to bring required flexibility in the functioning of higher education (HE).

Irrespective of the model selected for PPP in HE, it is requested and suggested that the need of TRAINING OF THE FACULTY AT HIGHER EDUCATION should be given top priority. As a gesture a suitable act be passed on the lines of National Commission for Human Resources for Health (established under the National Commission for Human Resources for Health Act, 2011) and the Chairperson of such body should be a member of the General Council as ex-officio member. The General Council is supposed to support National Commission on Higher Education, to be formed under HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH BILL, 2011.
-Dr. S. M. Kulkarni

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

PPP is the best model in which private parties should invest and government bodies may run with reasonable return to the invester and nomination in the governing bodies.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

whatever be PPP model out of four models of Planning commission, CAG audit manual for PPP-2009 as well as PPP toolkit 2010 must be made mandatory for sanctioning such ppp projects.
In the absence of rigourous examination of PPP projects in regard to value of money, total realistic cost (not inflated cost as usual practice in PPP projects to extort money from public) , preaudit prior to signing to PPP agreement, RTI compliance of ppp agency , no ppp policy, ppp rules till date , PPP will become a means to extort money from public only WITHOUT SERVING PURPOSE.
It is surprising that experts are advocating PPP despite PPP rules 2011 , PPP policy 2011 in the drafting stage (not finalized stage). No expert in this article have thrown light on draft PPP policy 2011, draft ppp rules 2011 , so their opinion in favour of ppp seems to be blind favour of extortion of money in the name of PPP.
It is very shameful for india that as per RTI reply, in engineering education, there is no limit on number of attempts during graduation for becoming faculty nor there is any provision of disclosure of attempts in engineering education as in medical education (Dr. S.K. Khanna (ex. chairman AICTE) should suggest maximum permissible number of attempts during B.E. for appointing him as faculty in engineering education rather than blindly favouring ppp model .

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

I very much agree with Dr. Kulkarni and if India will not opt for PPP we cannot provide education to the large number of population that we have.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

Private engineering colleges are contributing a major role in the technical education system in India.But, flexible curriculum,timely publication of result,updating appropriate technology in need ,installation of modern and costly laboratories etc are few hindrances for providing competency based technical education to our students.In this context Cluster university model may be implemented for private Engineering colleges in India for strengthen the technical Education system .

About Author

India Education Review
India Education Review is a platform that aims to provide information and resources to senior educators nationwide. Carrying news, interviews, guest articles, case studies, information on training and developmental programs, scholarships and jobs, India Education Review is the platform of choice for the educator community in India today